The nbc 461 at Benguet State University

Main Article Content

Maria Azucena B. Lubrica

Abstract

The NBC 461 was perceived by the teachers as Satisfactory to Very Satisfactory in its comprehensiveness, Fairly Satisfactory to Satisfactory in its implementation, Moderately Effective to Very Effective as a motivating factor, Moderately Effective in improving teacher efficiency, and Moderately Effective to Very Effective in improving teacher productivity. The teachers also perceived the problems on the NBC 461 as Moderately Serious to Very Serious.


The NBC 461 can still be improved and the problems related to the NBC 461 can still be made less serious, minimized or even eliminated if the administrators and faculty concerned would address each problem objectively and sincerely. This would serve as a feedback mechanism for the BSU administrators concerned with the NBC 461 implementation, for the NBC 461 Zonal implementers, and even for the national level policy-makers, to pave the way for possible improvement on the NBC 461 Instrument and Evaluation procedure.


The teachers also perceived the problems on the NBC 461 as Moderately Serious to Very Serious.


Very few teachers considered that there is any association of the NBC 461 with the class size they handle, and with their students' academic performance. However, about half of the teachers believed that the NBC 461 had some effect on improving teachers' performance evaluation rating.


The NBC 461 can still be improved and the problems related to the NBC 461 can still be made less serious, minimized or even eliminated if the administrators and faculty concerned would address each problem objectively and sincerely. This would serve as a feedback mechanism for the BSU administrators concerned with the NBC 461 implementation, for the NBC 461 Zonal implementers, and even for the national level policy-makers, to pave the way for possible improvement on the NBC 461 Instrument and Evaluation procedure.

Article Details

Section
Articles

References

ABASOLO, P. A. 1991. Personnel Management: The Efficient Management of Employees. Manila:GIC Enterprises and Co. , Inc. pp.107-108.

GRIFFIN, R.W. 1987. Management. Boston: Houghton Miffin Co. p.408.

LUBRICA, M.A.B. 1996. Published Dissertation. Promotion and Merit Schemes of State Universities and Colleges in the Cordillera Administrative Region

MC KEACHIE, W.J. and Y.G. Lin. 1975. Use of Student Ratings in the Evaluation of College Teaching.

SIDNEY, TOBY. 1988. Journal of Chemical Education, V65, #9, pp.788-790, Sep 1988.

WILLIAMS, R. and J.C. ORY. 1992. A Further Look at Class Size, Discipline Differences and Students Ratings. Unpublished manuscript, Office of Instructional Resources, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

http:// ed n ate son Ii n e. b I og spot. co m/2 008/0 2/ quality-teachers-vs-small-class-size.

html http ://www. math. byu. ed u ./-ja rvis/class-sizepreprint.pdf.

Most read articles by the same author(s)